AI AEO GEO

How to Rank in Large Language Models (LLMs): A Practical Playbook

Pure Rank Digital Team 10 Aug, 2025 20 min read Answer Engine Optimisation Updated - 10 Aug, 2025
LLM ranking playbook hero
LLM ranking concepts: answer patterns, sources, and authority signals

To earn visibility in AI answers, you need content that is extractable, trustworthy, and complete. This guide shows how to structure pages and entities so Google, ChatGPT, Perplexity and Claude can lift the right facts, explanations and recommendations from your site and cite you as a source.

What “ranking in LLMs” really means

LLMs do not rank pages like the ten blue links. They assemble answers, then attribute sources. Your objective is to be included and cited when the model composes its response. That requires semantic clarity, coverage breadth, and strong authority signals from a consistent entity graph.

New success metrics

  • Answer inclusion - how often your brand is cited inside AI answers
  • Impression share - visibility during key discovery moments, even with zero click
  • Topical authority - depth and completeness across a topic cluster
  • Trust signals - E E A T evidence mapped to people and organisations

Extraction patterns LLMs prefer

LLMs favour content blocks that are easy to lift and cite. Design pages so key facts, steps and recommendations are clearly demarcated.

High yield patterns

  • Definition blocks - a concise one to three sentence definition directly under the H2.
  • Numbered steps - ordered lists for processes; each step starts with a verb.
  • Pros and cons tables - compact comparison with clear headings.
  • Fact panels - short bullet list with quantifiable data points and sources.
  • FAQs - question as subheading, one paragraph answer.

Answer first layout

Lead with the answer, then provide the reasoning and sources. This mirrors AI responses and improves extractability.

  • • State the answer in one to two sentences.
  • • Provide three to five supporting bullets.
  • • Add a short example or calculation.
  • • Link or cite one to three authoritative sources.

Pros and cons example

Option Pros Cons Best for
Server side rendering Fresh data, good for personalisation Higher server load, more complexity Dashboards and logged in experiences
Static generation Fast, cache friendly, simple to scale Needs rebuild for content updates Marketing pages and documentation

Fact panel example

  • 68 percent of answers cite two to four sources in practice.
  • Definitions within the first 120 words raise extractability.
  • Pages with FAQs are about 1.6 times more likely to be cited.
  • Recently updated content within ninety days is favoured for freshness.

Evaluating extraction quality

Use this checklist to see if your page produces clean, liftable blocks for AI answers.

  • • Can the definition under the H2 be copied as one sentence without edits?
  • • Do numbered steps stand alone and start with a verb?
  • • Are tables labelled with clear headers and one concept per cell?
  • • Are citations adjacent to claims, not collected far below?
  • • Is the page updated within ninety days if it includes time sensitive data?
  • • Are units and ranges included where relevant?

Quick copy and paste tests

  • • Copy the first one hundred and twenty words. Does it read as a usable snippet?
  • • Copy one numbered list. Do lines parse as steps without extra context?
  • • Copy a pros and cons table into a spreadsheet. Do headers and rows remain intact?
  • • Copy one FAQ pair. Is the answer complete on its own?

Patterns to avoid

  • • Long introductions before the answer.
  • • Nested accordions that hide content from parsers.
  • • Images of text in place of real text.
  • • Over styled components with non semantic HTML.
  • • Vague adjectives and idioms that reduce clarity.
  • • Paragraphs much longer than one hundred and twenty words.

📊 Visual Example: HTML Markup for AI/LLM Extraction

❌ BAD: Non-Semantic HTML
<div class="step"> <span>1.</span> <span>Install dependencies</span> </div> <div class="step"> <span>2.</span> <span>Configure settings</span> </div> <div class="step"> <span>3.</span> <span>Run the application</span> </div>

⚠️ Problems:

  • • AI can't identify this as a numbered list
  • • No semantic meaning for search engines
  • • Poor accessibility for screen readers
  • • Harder to extract structured data
✅ BETTER: Semantic HTML
<ol> <li>Install dependencies</li> <li>Configure settings</li> <li>Run the application</li> </ol>

Benefits:

  • • AI instantly recognizes ordered steps
  • • Search engines understand structure
  • • Perfect accessibility support
  • • Easy to extract and cite

💡 Key Takeaway:

Always use semantic HTML elements (ol, ul, li, article, section, nav) instead of generic divs. This helps AI understand your content structure and improves extraction accuracy by 40-60% according to recent studies.

Content architecture for topical authority

Cover the whole task space around a topic, not just keywords. Build hubs that map to user intents and follow up questions.

Hub model

  • Hub page - comprehensive overview with definitions, patterns and navigation to details.
  • Pillar articles - deep dives on the main subtopics (methods, tools, evaluation).
  • Spokes - narrowly scoped how to, checklists, comparisons and FAQs.

Topical hub example - Home solar guide

Example hub structure that covers the whole task space.

  1. Hub - Home solar guide (benefits, costs, steps, FAQs)
  2. Pillars -
    • • Solar panels types and efficiency
    • • Costs, incentives and payback
    • • Installation process and timelines
    • • Maintenance, warranties and troubleshooting
    • • Compare installers and contracts
  3. Spokes -
    • • How to read a solar quote
    • • Monocrystalline versus polycrystalline
    • • What is net metering
    • • Checklist - site survey for a terrace house
    • • FAQ - winter performance in the UK

Text hub map

Hub - Home solar guide
├─ Pillar - Types and efficiency
│  ├─ Spoke - Monocrystalline versus polycrystalline
│  └─ Spoke - Winter performance in the UK
├─ Pillar - Costs and incentives
│  ├─ Spoke - Payback calculator example
│  └─ Spoke - Grant and VAT rules
└─ Pillar - Installation process
   ├─ Spoke - Site survey checklist
   └─ Spoke - Installer contract terms

Editorial standards that improve extraction

  • • One idea per paragraph; keep sentences under about 24 words where possible.
  • • Use descriptive subheadings that match how users ask questions.
  • • Include units, ranges and constraints (e.g., "within 24 to 48 hours", "±10%").
  • • Prefer precise nouns and verbs over adjectives and adverbs.

Build a consistent entity graph

LLMs rely on entity understanding to decide which sources to trust. Align on stable identifiers and reinforce relationships across your site and profiles.

Minimum viable entity set

  • Organization with @id, legal name, sameAs, logo, contact.
  • Person authors with expertise, affiliations, and profile links.
  • WebSite and WebPage/Article nodes for each page.
  • FAQPage sections for common questions when appropriate.

Article JSON-LD template

{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "Article",
  "@id": "https://example.com/blog/how-to-rank-in-llms#article",
  "headline": "How to Rank in Large Language Models (LLMs): A Practical Playbook",
  "datePublished": "2025-08-10",
  "dateModified": "2025-08-10",
  "author": [{
    "@type": "Person",
    "@id": "https://example.com/#person-author",
    "name": "Pure Rank Digital Team",
    "sameAs": ["https://www.linkedin.com/company/purerankdigital/"]
  }],
  "publisher": {
    "@type": "Organization",
    "@id": "https://example.com/#org",
    "name": "Pure Rank Digital",
    "logo": {"@type": "ImageObject", "url": "https://example.com/logo.png"},
    "sameAs": ["https://twitter.com/purerank", "https://www.linkedin.com/company/purerankdigital/"]
  },
  "mainEntityOfPage": {"@type": "WebPage", "@id": "https://example.com/blog/how-to-rank-in-llms"}
}

FAQ block template

{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "FAQPage",
  "mainEntity": [{
    "@type": "Question",
    "name": "What does it mean to rank in LLMs?",
    "acceptedAnswer": {"@type": "Answer", "text": "Inclusion and citation inside AI answers."}
  }]
}

Measurement and operations

Scorecard

  • Inclusion rate - appearances or citations in AI answers by topic.
  • Coverage completeness - hub, pillars, spokes present with definitions, steps, FAQs.
  • Evidence depth - percent of pages with sources, data points and dates.
  • Entity integrity - pages with valid JSON-LD and resolvable @id links.

Weekly workflow

  1. • Review AI answers for top topics; log inclusion and missing facets.
  2. • Update hub/pillars with definitions, steps, tables and FAQ additions.
  3. • Add or refine schema; validate in rich results testing tools.
  4. • Publish, then spot-check extraction quality with copy/paste tests.

FAQs

What does it mean to rank in LLMs?

It means your content is included and cited inside AI answers, not just listed as a link. The aim is inclusion and attribution.

How do I make content more extractable?

Lead with an answer, use numbered steps, compact tables and FAQs, add sources next to claims, and keep sentences concise.

Do keywords still matter?

They help with recall, but intent coverage, clarity and topical depth now matter more for inclusion in answers.

How often should I update pages?

Update when facts change and at least once per quarter for time sensitive topics. Show dates and version notes where helpful.

What schema should I prioritise?

Start with Organization, Person, WebSite and Article. Add FAQPage for question sections and cite authoritative sources.

References

  1. Google - AI Overviews and your website — https://developers.google.com/search/docs/appearance/ai-overviews
  2. Google - Search Quality Rater Guidelines (E-E-A-T) — https://developers.google.com/search/blog/2022/12/google-raters-guidelines-e-e-a-t
  3. schema.org - Article — https://schema.org/Article
  4. schema.org - FAQPage — https://schema.org/FAQPage
  5. Moz - Zero-click searches — https://moz.com/blog/zero-click-searches
  6. Ahrefs - AI search optimisation — https://ahrefs.com/blog/ai-search-optimization/

If you found this article helpful, hit the thumbs up button

Ready to transform your search strategy for the AI era?

Contact Pure Rank Digital to develop a comprehensive AI Mode optimization strategy that positions your brand for success in the evolving search landscape.

Get Started Today

Enterprise Contact

Learn which plan is right for your team
Get onboarding help

Have other questions?

To better understand how we help our clients, please read client case studies

Feel free to reach out if you have any questions, Contact us

How long until SEO works and when will we see results? +

Short answer: most clients see meaningful, measurable growth in 3–6 months. You’ll usually notice early signals within 4–8 weeks (better indexation, rising impressions, small ranking lifts, more enquiries).

What affects the pace:

  • Your starting point (site health, content depth, backlinks, tracking).
  • Competition in your niche/locations.
  • How fast we can publish quality content and earn links.
  • Technical debt (crawl, speed, Core Web Vitals, UX).
  • Budget and scope.

What the first 6 months look like:

  • Weeks 1–4: Full audit, fix critical technical issues, tracking set-up, quick wins, on-page clean-up, internal linking, schema.
  • Months 2–3: New content goes live, local signals/citations strengthen, authority building starts; rankings and impressions begin to move.
  • Months 3–6: Compounding gains—more page-one entries, steady traffic uplift, and most businesses start to feel the lead/revenue impact.

Disclaimer:

  • No one can guarantee page-one by a date. If they do, walk away.
  • Brand-new domains or highly competitive markets can take longer. Core updates can nudge timelines.

What we commit to:

  • A clear roadmap with weekly/fortnightly updates.
  • Transparent reporting in GA4, GSC and Looker Studio (not vanity metrics).
  • Quality content, safe link acquisition, and ongoing technical optimisation—no gimmicks.

Bottom line: SEO isn’t instant, but if we execute properly, 3–6 months is a realistic window to see meaningful results, with momentum building from there.

Do you lock clients into long-term contracts? +

No. We ask for a 6-month commitment, then it’s rolling month-to-month with 30-day notice. No auto-renewals. No exit fees.

Why 6 months? That’s the minimum to audit, fix technical issues, implement the required amount of content, build authority, and prove ROI. After that, we keep you by results, not contracts.

This is the best arrangement you’ll find in the market and it reflects our confidence in the process. If we’re not delivering, you’re free to walk. Simple.

Is SEO still worth it in 2025? +

Yes if you treat it as Search + Answer + Brand. People still start with Google, but the results page now includes Google AI Overviews and Google’s AI Mode. On top of that, your customers are asking ChatGPT, Gemini and Perplexity “who’s the best near me?” If you’re not optimised for these answer engines, you’re invisible where decisions are being made.

What changed

  • AI Overviews/AI Mode summarise an answer and cite sources. If you’re not a cited source, you’re not in the consideration set.
  • LLMs recommend brands based on authority, consistency and corroboration across the web, not just on-page keywords.

What works now (our approach)

  • AEO/GEO (Answer/Generative Engine Optimisation): We engineer pages to be citable with clear answers above the fold, verified stats, original assets, and tight information architecture that LLMs can lift from confidently.
  • Entity & brand building: We strengthen your brand entity so Google and LLMs can recognise and choose you, consistent NAP (Name, Address, Phone), author E-E-A-T, citations, reviews, PR and high-authority mentions.
  • Structured data done properly: Full schema coverage (Organisation, Services, FAQs, HowTo, Product, Reviews) to feed AI Overviews and knowledge graphs.
  • Content that wins snippets & summaries: Concise Q&A sections, comparisons, pricing pages, location/service pages that are formatted for extraction.
  • Technical SEO that still matters: Crawlability, speed/Core Web Vitals, self-referencing canonical tags, log-file driven internal linking... LLMs still read the same web.
  • Measurement beyond “sessions”: We track AI Overview citations, LLM recall/share of voice, brand mention velocity, zero-click impact, leads and revenue—not vanity rankings.

So… is it worth it?

If you only chase blue links, no. If you optimise for Google + AI Overviews + AI Mode + LLM pickers, absolutely. Organic still compounds and unlike ads, you’re not renting visibility.

Our commitment

  • 6-month commitment, then 30-day rolling (no handcuffs).
  • A clear roadmap focused on getting you cited and selected by Google’s AI surfaces and leading LLMs.
  • Transparent reporting tied to pipeline and revenue.

Bottom line: SEO in 2025 is about being the source AI trusts and the brand AI recommends. That’s what we build.

Can you help with Local SEO? +

Yes. We run Local SEO like a data project, not guesswork.

How we do it

  • Mine your data first: We pull query intelligence from your Google Business Profile (GBP) and historic Google Search Console data (by location). This shows exactly which location-based searches you’re appearing for...and which you’re missing. We use this to map gaps and prioritise what to publish next.
  • Build the right local assets:
    • Unique location + service pages (no doorway fluff): clear offer, proof, map, FAQs, CTAs.
    • GBP optimisation: correct primary/secondary categories, Services, Attributes, Products, Photos, Posts, Q&A.
    • Schema: LocalBusiness, Service, FAQ, GeoCoordinates; UTM-tagged GBP links for clean attribution.
  • Trust & authority: Consistent NAP, citation clean-up/build, review acquisition programme (with response playbooks), and local link wins (partners, sponsorships, press).
  • Technical & UX: Fast pages, mobile-first, internal linking to surface local relevance; strong conversion UX (click-to-call, directions, booking).
  • Measurement that matters: Map Pack/share-of-voice, geo-split GSC performance, calls, direction requests and enquiries reported monthly.

Bottom line: We gather query info from your Google Business Profile and past Google Search Console data to identify missing location content and then implement it; properly structured, locally credible, and measurable. Works for single-location and multi-location brands.

Who implements changes? Do you handle dev/CMS? +

Short answer: We do, end to end. If you’ve got an in-house developer or team, we’ll happily work through them. Either way, we insist on full, transparent comms.

How we work

  • Default (we implement): We implement changes straight to your site along with technical fixes, content updates, schema, internal linking and speed/Core Web Vitals. Staging → QA → deploy, with rollback covered.
  • With your dev team: We switch to “spec & support” mode, Jira/Linear-ready tickets, acceptance criteria, code snippets/PRs, and reviews. We’ll align to your process and release periods.
  • CMS/stack coverage: WordPress (Gutenberg/Elementor), Shopify, Webflow, and headless stacks (e.g. Next.js). For custom builds, we contribute PRs or supply components/templates.
  • Access & governance: Least-privilege access, backups, staging-first releases, GTM workspace/approvals, and a clear changelog you can audit.
  • Transparency: One shared channel, clear roadmap, what’s in flight, what’s implemented and the impact.

Bottom line: We handle implementation unless you prefer your devs to. We’re effective both ways, provided we can collaborate directly with your team, keeping you in the loop at all times.

Can you help after a core update or penalty? +

Yes. We’ve worked with clients who came to us under a Google penalty and we’ve addressed the issues and successfully appealed until the penalty was removed. For core update hits, we’ve led full recoveries by fixing the underlying site and content issues. That said, recovery depends on severity and how long the problem has existed. No fairy dust.

What we actually do

  • Triage: Confirm if it’s a manual action (in GSC) or algorithmic impact from a core update.
  • Forensics: Directory/template-level diffing of winners vs losers, log-file and crawl analysis, indexation/canonical checks, internal linking, CWV, entity/intent alignment, content quality (E-E-A-T), and link risk.
  • Remediation plan:
    • Technical: crawl/indexation hygiene, canonical fixes, Core Web Vitals, rendering.
    • Content: consolidate thin/duplicative pages, add original evidence, pricing/process/FAQs, author creds, citations, and schema.
    • Architecture: tighter internal linking and topic clustering.
    • Links: remove/neutralise manipulative links where possible; disavow only when justified.
  • Manual actions: Prepare evidence pack and submit reconsideration requests, iterating until resolved.
  • Monitoring: Track recovery with GSC/GA4, query sets, directories, and templates (not vanity charts).

Disclaimer

  • Manual penalties: Often fixable with proper clean-up and strong documentation; timelines vary.
  • Core updates: Improvements can lift you sooner, but full recovery often aligns with subsequent updates.
  • Limits: Long-standing or severe violations, heavy link schemes, or years of thin content take longer and may not fully rebound.

Bottom line: We’ve removed penalties and reversed core-update losses before. We’ll tell you, upfront, what’s realistic and then do the hard work to get you back.

How do you communicate and how often? +

Channels:

WhatsApp, Slack, Teams, phone, video calls, and face-to-face messages. We’ll use what your team already lives in.

Cadence (straight talk):

  • Intense periods (troubleshooting / launches / incidents): as frequent as up to 10 touchpoints per day across chat/calls—whatever it takes to resolve fast.
  • Steady state: at least once a week. Typically a weekly update (results, what shipped, what’s next) plus a quick call if needed.

How we run comms:

  • One shared channel (Slack/Teams) for transparency and speed.
  • WhatsApp for urgent decisions.
  • Scheduled video/phone check-ins (weekly or fortnightly).
  • Clear action logs and a visible changelog so nothing gets lost.

Bottom line: We’re easy to reach, we communicate like adults, and the frequency flexes with the work, from 10x/day when needed to a light weekly touchpoints when things are going as expected.